If you’ve been following financial news, you’ve likely noticed a shift in how the media talks about artificial intelligence. Earlier this year, AI headlines were full of optimism and breakthroughs. Recently, though, the tone has cooled. Terms like “AI fatigue” and “disappointing results” are showing up more often, and the conversation feels more cautious.
Warren Buffett has officially stepped down from Berkshire Hathaway, and last month he wrote his final shareholder letter. While much of it reflected on his upbringing, he closed with a few “final thoughts” that offer powerful guidance for investors today.
Seinfeld fans love the irrational antics of George Costanza, partly because we recognize pieces of ourselves in his behavior. While George never set out to give financial advice, his quirks highlight important truths about human behavior and investing. In Season 5, Episode 20, George is at a birthday party when he suddenly spots a fire. Panic sets in. He bolts for the door, pushing aside an elderly woman and even peeling a child off the exit. Rational George disappeared the instant fear took over.
The media often run sensational, concerning headlines that can mislead investors who take them at face value. In recent weeks, much has been made about extended valuations, with reports noting that the Shiller P/E ratio is the highest since the dot-com bubble. But is valuation really a reliable gauge?
The best investors aren’t defined solely by knowledge or access to information. Much like world-class poker players, their real edge is mental game—the ability to stay composed and make sound decisions under pressure. Maria Konnikova, in her work on professional poker, notes that what separates the truly elite from the merely good is psychological fortitude: the capacity to perform consistently despite setbacks, mistakes, and poor short-term results. Investing is no different. Success often hinges less on finding the “right” stocks and more on maintaining discipline when fear and uncertainty are highest.
Lately, the headlines have zeroed in on artificial intelligence. Some say AI is in a bubble and warn of a coming burst. But AI is just the latest storyline. Not long ago, it was inflation, rising interest rates, or fears of recession. Add in concerns about high stock valuations and a slowing economy, and there’s always something to make investors uneasy. For many, the natural question becomes: What should I do?
2025 has tested investors with market dips from tariff shocks, geopolitical tensions like the Israel–Iran conflict, and sliding consumer confidence—yet the S&P 500 has rebounded more than 24% from April’s low. In such volatility, the temptation to pull out is strong, but doing so risks missing the recovery. The key is to focus on what you can control, stick to your long-term financial plan, and ride out the turbulence with your goals in sight.
April showered us with a few days of strong stock market losses. The market lost nearly 5% one day, followed by 6% the next day for a total drawdown of 18% from recent highs. When such strong losses occur, it is totally natural for our brains to go haywire. The losses, accompanied by negative headlines, feed our anxiety and can trigger strong urges to get to safety by selling now and asking questions later. But following those urges is seldom the best response. A better response is to take a step back regain composure. In my experience, I have found the following four actions to be helpful during difficult market times.
There’s no shortage of things to worry about today—tariffs, economic uncertainty, global unrest—and all of it can impact our financial future. The media often magnifies these concerns, focusing on fear because it grabs attention. Over time, this constant exposure can affect our mood, cloud our thinking, lead to unproductive decisions, and—most importantly—erode our personal happiness.
Investors often ask about how the economy is doing. This is no surprise because we are constantly inundated with information; it can be difficult to draw accurate conclusions when much of the information is biased and incomplete. The answer to that question, and really question, depends largely on where you get your information. The primary source of investor information is the financial media. Yet, the media often leads with fear, reports of crises and the need to act urgently – because that is what gets people to tune in. Rarely, if ever, do you get the full story.